Verified Solution[tensorflow/tensorflow] tf.math.reciprocal_no_nan returns inconsistent results for identical complex inf+0j inputs
Sponsored Content
### ROOT CAUSE
The issue arises because `tf.math.reciprocal_no_nan` does not consistently handle complex infinity inputs. The function uses `std::isnan` to check for NaN, but this does not detect infinity. As a result, for complex infinity inputs, the function falls back to computing the reciprocal, which returns 0 for real infinity but may produce inconsistent results for complex infinity due to floating-point precision or system-specific behavior.
### CODE FIX
```cpp
// In the kernel implementation for reciprocal_no_nan, add a condition to check for infinity
if (std::isnan(x)) {
*y = x;
} else if (std::isinf(x) || std::abs(x) == std::numeric_limits::infinity()) {
*y = 0;
} else {
*y = recip(x);
}
```
This ensures that any input (real or complex) that is either NaN or infinity is handled consistently by returning the input for NaN and 0 for infinity.
Deploy on DigitalOcean ($200 Credit)
Related Fixes
[StackOverflow/python] Django version upgrade while using Django River 3.3.0
[StackOverflow/python] Unable to import SparkSession in Pyspark
[StackOverflow/rust] How to use Postgres timestamp ranges in Rust with time-rs, especially NULL and (-)infinity?